ING CHARLES THE SECOND was the son and successor of King Charles the First. These two are the only kings of the name of Charles that
have appeared, thus far, in the line of English sovereigns. Nor is it very probable that there will soon be
another. The reigns of both these monarchs were stained and tarnished with many vices and crimes, and darkened
by national disasters of every kind, and the name is thus connected with so many painful associations in the
minds of men, that it seems to have been dropped, by common consent, in all branches of the royal family.
The reign of Charles the First, as will be seen by the history of his life in this series, was characterized by
a long and obstinate contest between the king and the people, which brought on, at last, a civil war, in which
the king was
 defeated and taken prisoner, and in the end beheaded on a block, before one of his own palaces. During the last
stages of this terrible contest, and before Charles was himself taken prisoner, he was, as it were, a fugitive
and an outlaw in his own dominions. His wife and family were scattered in various foreign lands, his cities and
castles were in the hands of his enemies, and his oldest son, the prince Charles, was the object of special
hostility. The prince incurred, therefore, a great many dangers, and suffered many heavy calamities in his
early years. He lived to see these calamities pass away, and, after they were gone, he enjoyed, so far as his
own personal safety and welfare were concerned, a tranquil and prosperous life. The storm, however, of trial
and suffering which enveloped the evening of his father's days, darkened the morning of his own. The life of
Charles the First was a river rising gently, from quiet springs, in a scene of verdure and sunshine, and
flowing gradually into rugged and gloomy regions, where at last it falls into a terrific abyss, enveloped in
darkness and storms. That of Charles the Second, on the other hand, rising in the wild and rugged mountains
where the parent stream was engulfed, commences its
 course by leaping frightfully from precipice to precipice, with turbid and foaming waters, but emerges at last
into a smooth and smiling land, and flows through it prosperously to the sea.
Prince Charles's mother, the wife of Charles the First, was a French princess. Her name was Henrietta Maria.
She was an accomplished, beautiful, and very spirited woman. She was a Catholic, and the English people, who
were very decided in their hostility to the Catholic faith, were extremely jealous of her. They watched all her
movements with the utmost suspicion. They were very unwilling that an heir to the crown should arise in her
family. The animosity which they felt against her husband the king, which was becoming every day more and more
bitter, seemed to be doubly inveterate and intense toward her. They published pamphlets, in which they called
her a daughter of Heth, a Canaanite, and an idolatress, and expressed hopes that from such a worse than pagan
stock no progeny should ever spring.
Henrietta was at this time—1630—twenty-one years of age, and had been married about four years. She had had one
son, who had died a few days after his birth. Of course, she did not lead a very happy life in England. Her
 husband the king, like the majority of the English people, was a Protestant, and the difference was a far more
important circumstance in those days than it would be now; though even now a difference in religious faith, on
points which either party deems essential, is, in married life, an obstacle to domestic happiness, which
comes to no termination, and admits of no cure. If it were possible for reason and reflection to control the
impetuous impulses of youthful hearts, such differences of religious faith would be regarded, where they exist,
as an insurmountable objection to a matrimonial union.
The queen, made thus unhappy by religious dissensions with her husband, and by the public odium of which she
was the object, lived in considerable retirement and seclusion at St. James's Palace, in Westminster, which is
the western part of London. Here her second son, the subject of this history, was born, in May, 1630, which was
ten years after the landing of the pilgrims on the Plymouth rock. The babe was very far from being pretty,
though he grew up at last to be quite a handsome man. King Charles was very much pleased at the birth of his
son. He rode into London the next morning
 at the head of a long train of guards and noble attendants, to the great cathedral church of St. Paul's, to
render thanks publicly to God for the birth of his child and the safety of the queen. While this procession was
going through the streets, all London being out to gaze upon it, the attention of the vast crowd was attracted
to the appearance of a star glimmering faintly in the sky at midday. This is an occurrence not very uncommon,
though it seldom, perhaps, occurs when it has so many observers to witness it. The star was doubtless Venus,
which, in certain circumstances, is often bright enough to be seen when the sun is above the horizon. The
populace of London, however, who were not in those days very profound astronomers, regarded the shining of the
star as a supernatural occurrence altogether, and as portending the future greatness and glory of the prince
whose natal day it thus unexpectedly adorned.
Preparations were made for the baptism of the young prince in July. The baptism of a prince is an important
affair, and there was one circumstance which gave a peculiar interest to that of the infant Charles. The
Reformation had not been long established in England, and this happened to be the first
occa-  sion on which an heir to the English crown had been baptized since the Liturgy of the English Church had been
arranged. There is a chapel connected with the palace of St. James, as is usual with royal palaces in Europe,
and even, in fact, with the private castles and mansions of the higher nobility. The baptism took place there.
On such occasions it is usual for certain persons to appear as sponsors, as they are called, who undertake to
answer for the safe and careful instruction of the child in the principles of the Christian faith. This is, of
course, mainly a form, the real function of the sponsors being confined, as it would appear, to making
magnificent presents to their young godchild, in acknowledgment of the distinguished honor conferred upon them
by their designation to the office which they hold. The sponsors, on this occasion, were certain royal
personages in France, the relatives of the queen. They could not appear personally, and so they appointed
proxies from among the higher nobility of England, who appeared at the baptism in their stead, and made the
presents to the child. One of these proxies was a duchess, whose gift was a jewel valued at a sum in English
money equal to thirty thousand dollars.
 The oldest son of a king of England receives the title of Prince of Wales; and there was an ancient custom of
the realm, that an infant prince of Wales should be under the care, in his earliest years, of a Welsh nurse, so
that the first words which he should learn to speak might be the vernacular language of his principality. Such
a nurse was provided for Charles. Rockers for his cradle were appointed, and many other officers of his
household, all the arrangements being made in a very magnificent and sumptuous manner. It is the custom in
England to pay fees to the servants by which a lady or gentleman is attended, even when a guest in private
dwellings; and some idea may be formed of the scale on which the pageantry of this occasion was conducted, from
the fact that one of the lady sponsors who rode to the palace in the queen's carriage, which was sent for her
on this occasion, paid a sum equal to fifty dollars each to six running footmen who attended the carriage, and
a hundred dollars to the coachman; while a number of knights who came on horseback and in armor to attend upon
the carriage, as it moved to the palace, received each a gratuity of two hundred and fifty dollars. The state
dresses on the occasion of this
 baptism were very costly and splendid, being of white satin trimmed with crimson.
The little prince was thus an object of great attention at the very commencement of his days, His mother had
his portrait painted, and sent it to her mother in France. She did not, however, in the letters
which accompanied the picture, though his mother, praise the beauty of her child. She said, in fact, that he
was so ugly that she was ashamed of him, though his size and plumpness, she added, atoned for the want of
beauty. And then he was so comically serious and grave in the expression of his countenance! the queen said she
verily believed that he was wiser than herself.
As the young prince advanced in years, the religious and political difficulties in the English nation
increased, and by the time that he had arrived at an age when he could begin to receive impressions from the
conversation and intercourse of those around him, the Parliament began to be very jealous of the influence
which his mother might exert. They were extremely anxious that he should be educated a Protestant, and were
very much afraid that his mother would contrive to initiate him secretly into the ideas and practices of the
 She insisted that she did not attempt to do this, and perhaps she did not; but in those days it was often
considered right to make false pretensions and to deceive, so far as this was necessary to promote the cause of
true religion. The queen did certainly make some efforts to instill Catholic principles into the minds of some
of her children; for she had other children after the birth of Charles. She gave a daughter a crucifix one day,
which is a little image of Christ upon the cross, made usually of ivory, or silver, or gold, and also a rosary,
which is a string of beads, by means of which the Catholics are assisted to count their prayers. Henrietta gave
these things to her daughter secretly, and told her to hide them in her pocket, and taught her how to use them.
The Parliament considered such attempts to influence the minds of the royal children as very heinous sins, and
they made such arrangements for secluding the young prince Charles from his mother, and putting the others
under the guidance of Protestant teachers and governors, as very much interfered with Henrietta's desires to
enjoy the society of her children. Since England was a Protestant realm, a Catholic lady, in marrying an
English king, ought not to have expected, perhaps, to
 have been allowed to bring up her children in her own faith; still, it must have been very hard for a mother to
be forbidden to teach her own children what she undoubtedly believed was the only possible means of securing
for them the favor and protection of Heaven.
There is in London a vast storehouse of books, manuscripts, relics, curiosities, pictures, and other memorials
of by-gone days, called the British Museum. Among the old records here preserved are various letters written by
Henrietta, and one or two by Charles, the young prince, during his childhood. Here is one, for instance,
written by Henrietta to her child, when the little prince was but eight years of age, chiding him for not being
willing to take his medicine. He was at that time under the charge of Lord Newcastle.
"CHARLES,—I am sorry that I must begin my first letter with chiding you, because I hear that you will not take
phisicke, I hope it was onlie for this day, and that to-morrow you will do it for if you will not, I must come
to you, and make you take it, for it is for your health. I have given order to mi Lord of Newcastle to
send mi word to-night whether you will or not. Therefore I hope you will not give me the paines to goe; and so
I rest, your affectionate mother,
The letter was addressed:
To MI DEARE SONNE the Prince.
 The queen must have taken special pains with this her first letter to her son, for, with all its faults of
orthography, it is very much more correct than most of the epistles which she attempted to write in English.
She was very imperfectly acquainted with the English language, using, as she almost always did, in her domestic
intercourse, her own native tongue.
Time passed on, and the difficulties and contests between King Charles and his people and Parliament became
more and more exciting and alarming. One after another of the king's most devoted and faithful ministers was
arrested, tried, condemned, and beheaded, notwithstanding all the efforts which their sovereign master could
make to save them. Parties were formed, and party spirit ran very high. Tumults were continually breaking out
about the palaces, which threatened the personal safety of the king and queen. Henrietta herself was a special
object of the hatred which these outbreaks expressed. The king himself was half distracted by the overwhelming
difficulties of his position. Bad as it was in England, it was still worse in Scotland. There was an actual
rebellion there, and the urgency of the danger in that quarter was so great that Charles
con-  cluded to go there, leaving the poor queen at home to take care of herself and her little ones as well as
she could, with the few remaining means of protection yet left at her disposal.
There was an ancient mansion, called Oatlands, not very far from London, where the queen generally resided
during the absence of her husband. It was a lonely place, on low and level ground, and surrounded by moats
filled with water, over which those who wished to enter passed by draw-bridges. Henrietta chose this place for
her residence because she thought she should be safer there from mobs and violence. She kept the children all
there except the Prince of Wales, who was not allowed to be wholly under her care. He, however, often visited
his mother, and she sometimes visited him.
During the absence of her husband, Queen Henrietta was subjected to many severe and heavy trials. Her
communications with him were often interrupted and broken. She felt a very warm interest in the prosperity and
success of his expedition, and sometimes the tidings she received from him encouraged her to hope that all
might yet be well. Here, for instance, is a note which she addressed one day to an
of-  ficer who had sent her a letter from the king, that had come enclosed to him. It is written in a broken
English, which shows how imperfectly the foreign lady had learned the language of her adopted country. They who
understand the French language will be interested in observing that most of the errors which the writer falls
into are those which result naturally from the usages of her mother tongue.
Queen Henrietta to Sir Edward Nicholas.
"MAISTRE NICHOLAS,—I have reseaved your letter, and that you send me from the king,
which writes me word he as
been veré well reseaved in Scotland; that both the armi and the people have shewed a creat joy to see the king,
and such that theay say was never seen before. Pray God it may continue.
At one time during the king's absence in Scotland the Parliament threatened to take the queen's children all
away from her, for fear, as they said, that she would make papists of them. This danger alarmed and distressed
the queen exceedingly. She declared that she did not intend or desire to bring up her children in the Catholic
faith. She knew this was contrary to the wish of the king her husband, as well as of the people of England. In
order to diminish the danger that the children would be taken
 away, she left Oatlands herself, and went to reside at other palaces, only going occasionally to visit her
children. Though she was thus absent from them in person, her heart was with them all the time, and she was
watching with great solicitude and anxiety for any indications of a design on the part of her enemies to come
and take them away.
At last she received intelligence that an armed force was ordered to assemble one night in the vicinity of
Oatlands to seize her children, under the pretext that the queen was herself forming plans for removing them
out of the country and taking them to France. Henrietta was a lady of great spirit and energy, and this
threatened danger to her children aroused all her powers. She sent immediately to all the friends about her on
whom she could rely, and asked them to come, armed and equipped, and with as many followers as they could
muster, to the park at Oatlands that night. There were also then in and near London a number of officers of the
army, absent from their posts on furlough. She sent similar orders to these. All obeyed the summons with eager
alacrity. The queen mustered and armed her own household, too, down to the lowest servants of the
 kitchen. By these means quite a little army was collected in the park at Oatlands, the separate parties coming
in, one after another, in the evening and night. This guard patrolled the grounds till morning, the queen
herself animating them by her presence and energy. The children, whom the excited mother was thus guarding,
like a lioness defending her young, were all the time within the mansion, awaiting in infantile terror some
dreadful calamity, they scarcely knew what, which all this excitement seemed to portend.
The names and ages of the queen's children at this time were as follows:
Charles, prince of Wales, the subject of this story, eleven.
Mary, ten. Young as she was, she was already married, having been espoused a short time before to William,
prince of Orange, who was one year older than herself.
James, duke of York, seven. He became afterward King James II.
Henry, an infant only a few months old.
The night passed away without any attack, though a considerable force assembled in the vicinity, which was,
however, soon after
disband-  ed. The queen's fears were, nevertheless, not allayed. She began to make arrangements for escaping from the kingdom
in case it should become necessary to do so. She sent a certain faithful friend and servant to Portsmouth with
orders to get some vessels ready, so that she could fly there with her children and embark at a moment's
notice, if these dangers and alarms should continue.
She did not, however, have occasion to avail herself of these preparations. Affairs seemed to take a more
favorable turn. The king came back from Scotland. He was received by his people, on his arrival, with apparent
cordiality and good will. The queen was, of course, rejoiced to welcome him home, and she felt relieved and
protected by his presence. The city of London, which had been the main seat of disaffection and hostility to
the royal family, began to show symptoms of returning loyalty and friendly regard. In reciprocation for this,
the king determined on making a grand entry into the city, to pay a sort of visit to the authorities. He rode,
on this occasion, in a splendid chariot of state, with the little prince by his side. Queen Henrietta came
next, in an open carriage of her own, and the other children,
 with other carriages, followed in the train. A long cortège of guards and attendants, richly dressed and
magnificently mounted, preceded and followed the royal family, while the streets were lined with thousands of
spectators, who waved handkerchiefs and banners, and shouted God save the king! In the midst of this scene of
excitement and triumph, Henrietta rode quietly along, her anxieties relieved, her sorrows and trials ended, and
her heart bounding with happiness and hope. She was once more, as she conceived, reunited to her husband and
her children, and reconciled to the people of her realm. She thought her troubles were over. Alas! they had, on
the contrary, scarcely begun.
Hundreds of additional titles available for
online reading when you join Gateway to the Classics