|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The '15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE '15
[89] THE word "Jacobites" means "friends or followers of
James." Many people thought that the Stuart family
ought not to have been driven from the throne. They
believed that a king had the right to reign whatever he
might do, or whatever he might be. These were the real
Jacobites. Then there were many who were ready to help
them because for various reasons it suited them to do
so. There were the Roman Catholics, for instance, who
wanted to have a king of their own way of thinking.
There were, again, the Scotch Highlanders, who did not
like being under the rule of any but their own chiefs,
and hoped, besides, to get something for themselves by
a war, the country which they were going to invade
being much richer than their own. And there were some
people who, being very badly off, hoped to get some
profit out of a change of Government. Some even of the
great nobles who had had much to do with driving the
Stuarts out of the kingdom, began to consider
[90] whether it would not be well to have them back again.
They did not get as much as they wanted, or thought
they ought to have, from the new King. Perhaps if they
brought back the old one, he might give them more.
In the year 1700 Parliament passed what was called the
"Act of Settlement." On July 30 the young Duke of
Gloucester died, and there was then no one to come
after Queen Anne. Accordingly it was settled by this
Act that if, as seemed likely, the Queen should leave
no children, the throne should go to the family of
Sophia, wife of the Elector of Hanover. This lady was
the daughter of Elizabeth, who, again, was the daughter
of King James I. There were other persons who had a
better right to succeed—the Duchess of Savoy, for
instance, who was a grand-daughter of Charles I.; but
the choice was a good one, one great reason being that
the family were Protestants. But during the latter
years of Queen Anne's reign, the Jacobites were very
busy trying to set this arrangement aside. The Queen
disliked the Hanover family very much, and would have
been pleased that her brother should succeed her,
anyhow if he would consent to become a Protestant.
If she
[91] had lived longer, the Jacobites might have succeeded,
but she died rather suddenly, and the Elector of
Hanover, son of the Electress Sophia, was proclaimed
King, with the title of George I., without any
opposition.
Still, there were many people in the country who did
not like the idea of having a German king, one, too,
who could not speak a word of English, and the
Jacobites were not willing to let the opportunity pass
without trying to bring about a change.
The Queen had died on August 1, 1714. Some of the
friends of the Stuarts were for proclaiming the
Chevalier St. George as James III., but no one had the
courage to do so, and for a time it seemed as if
nothing would be done. But on August 2, 1715, the Earl
of Mar, who the day before had congratulated King
George on the anniversary of his succession, left
London to raise an insurrection in the Highlands. A few
friends went with him. They were disguised as sailors,
and pretended to be part of the crew of a small
collier. In about a fortnight's time he reached his
house in Aberdeenshire, and from there sent out
invitations for what was called a great
[92] hunting party, but was really a council of war. A
number of Highland noblemen and gentlemen attended, and
promised to raise all the troops they could collect. On
September 6 Lord Mar raised the standard of "King
James, Eighth of Scotland and Third of England," at the
village of Kirkmichael. No more than sixty men were
present, and these were much disturbed to see the gold
ball at the top of the standard fall off. But this
small band soon increased. Clan after clan joined it,
and before the end of the month nearly all the country
north of the Tay had risen for King James.
In the south of England, the Jacobites could do nothing
at all. The Government put the chief men belonging to
the party in prison, and so frightened the others that
when the Duke of Ormond, who was to lead the
insurrection in that part of the country, came over, he
did not find a single person to join him. But in the
north, where their party was much stronger, they rose,
with a gentleman of Northumberland of the name of
Forster for their leader. They were joined before long
by a party from the southwest of Scotland, led by Lord
Kenmure, and afterwards by two thousand men under a
certain Brigadier MacIntosh. MacIntosh had been sent by
Lord Mar to seize Edinburgh. This he was not able to
do. Accordingly he marched south, crossed the Border
[93] into England, and joined his forces with those led by
Mr. Forster and Lord Kenmure. It was but a small army,
scarcely more than two thousand men in all. It
defeated, however, almost without having to strike a
blow, a hasty levy of ten thousand men, with which the
Bishop of Carlisle and Lord Lonsdale sought to stop
their advance. This was at Penrith. The army then
advanced into Lancashire, where its numbers were
greatly increased. The new-comers, however, were but
poorly armed, some of them having neither swords nor
muskets, but only pitchforks and scythes.
The end of this expedition was very inglorious indeed.
The Jacobites took up their position at Preston, and if
they had been under a capable leader, they might have
made a long resistance. But Mr. Forster, who was in
command, seems to have had no skill in war, and no
courage. He did nothing to defend the approaches to
Preston, especially the bridge over the Ribble. This
was so important that when the English general saw that
it was not occupied, he felt quite sure that the
Jacobites must have left the town. Even then the place
was not easily taken. The English troops—there were not
more than a thousand of them—attacked it, but were
beaten back. In spite of this success, Forster
insisted on treating for surrender. The next day the
army laid down their arms. Many had taken the
[94] opportunity of escaping, but 1400 prisoners gave
themselves up. This took place on November 13.
On the very same day the insurrection in Scotland also
came to an end, though this end was not quite so
discreditable. The English Government had given the
command here to the Duke of Argyll, chief of the
powerful clan of the Campbells, and a man of great
ability. Lord Mar, on the contrary, was about as poor a
general as Mr. Forster. He stopped in Perth doing
nothing; whereas, if he had only bestirred himself, he
might, it is possible, have gained over the whole of
Scotland. At length, on November 10, he marched
southward. More men joined him as he went, till he had
about ten thousand in all, but they were a very mixed
and rough multitude, ill-armed, and with little or no
discipline. The Duke of Argyll, on the other hand, had
between three and four thousand men, but they were all
regular troops. The two armies met on a tract of open
country, near Dumblane, known by the name of
Sheriffmuir.
The Duke of Argyll was on the right wing of the loyal
army. The enemy opposite supposed themselves to be
protected by a marsh that lay between the two armies,
but the Duke reckoned that the ground would be hardened
by the frost that had happened in the night, and sent
some of his cavalry across it. He followed with the
rest, and charged the Jacobites
[95] so fiercely as to break their line. They gave way, and
were forced back to the river Allan, which was three
miles in their rear; many were drowned in attempting
to cross the stream. This part of the Jacobite army was
nearly destroyed.
Meanwhile things had been going very differently on the
other side of the field. The Highlanders under Lord
Mar, enraged by the death of the Chief of Clanronald,
who had fallen by the first volley fired from the
English ranks, made a furious charge. They thrust aside
the soldiers' bayonets with their targets or shields,
struck fiercely with their broadswords, and in a few
minutes completely routed the English left wing. The
English general fled from the field as fast as he could
gallop, and did not stop till he found himself in
Stirling. If the victorious Highlanders had followed
up their success, they might have gained a complete
victory. But there were divisions among them. What
remained of the centre and left of the English army was
able to join the Duke. Even then, as Argyll was leading
his troops in view of the rebel army, they might have
been scattered by a single charge. But Mar did nothing,
and even retreated. The Duke, on the other hand,
remained on the field of battle, and had some reason to
claim the victory.
But whoever it was that won or lost this battle,
[96] there was no more fighting. The Pretender himself, it
is true, landed in Scotland on December 22. He bestowed
some honours on his followers, named a council, issued
some proclamations, and fixed a day for his coronation.
But his cause was really hopeless. It had been expected
by his followers that he would bring an army with him.
But he came almost alone. Louis XIV., who had promised
to help him, had died a few months before, and the
French Government was not now friendly to him. He had
himself expected to find a great number of men ready to
follow him, and he saw only a few hundreds. It was
clearly useless to do anything more. On February 4 he
left Scotland. A few days afterwards, what was left of
the army dispersed. The leaders and officers fled from
the country—Lord Mar had gone with the Pretender—the
soldiers returned to their own homes.
THE TOWER OF LONDON.
|
The English Government did not behave with any great
severity to its prisoners. The most important
[97] of these were the noblemen who had surrendered at
Preston. Six of these pleaded guilty. Of the six, three
were reprieved; two, the Earls of Derwentwater and
Kenmure, were executed, and one, Lord Nithisdale,
escaped from the Tower of London, through the courage
of his wife. This lady had tried in vain all possible
means of obtaining mercy for her husband. On the
evening before the day appointed for his execution, she
visited his cell, taking two women with her, to bid
good-bye, as was supposed, to the condemned man. One of
them had upon her a second set of clothes. In these the
Earl was dressed; his face and hair were disguised; and
he passed out unsuspected by the guard.
Of the other insurgents but few were executed, and
among these were certain half-pay officers, who were
considered, not without reason, to be specially guilty.
|