|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Holy Island
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE HOLY ISLAND
[158]
EVER saw I so fair a mortal, man or woman," says the
shipwrecked Ulysses to the Phæacian maiden Nausicaa,
"and but once only as goodly a thing; 'twas in Delos,
the young sapling of a palm-tree that sprang up by the
altar of Apollo." This takes us back very far; how far
we cannot say, but probably, if we are to accept the
opinion of the majority of scholars, beyond 1000 B.C.Anyhow
[159] we may be certain that long before the dawn of history
Delos was a well-known place. An island so
insignificant in size—it is little more than five miles
in circumference—must have had something special to
make it famous, for the poet to mention it in this way,
the hero taking it for granted that Nausicaa, a native,
it must be remembered, of an island on the other side
of Greece, knows the place of which he is speaking.
What this special attraction was we learn from the
Homeric hymn to Apollo. The hymn is called "Homeric,"
and was, indeed, believed by the ancients to be of the
same date as the great poems. Modern criticism,
however, has detected traces of a later origin. Its
date is uncertain, but it may be conjecturally ascribed
to the middle of the seventh century B.C. In this Hymn
we read as follows:
"There are met together the long-robed sons of Ionia
with their children and their chaste wives; there in
honour of Apollo they wrestle and dance and sing. Whoso
shall see them will say: 'Deathless surely they are
and Death comes not near them,' so much of beauty would
he behold on every side, so full of delight would he be
to look upon the men, and the fair-girdled women, and
the swift ships, and the riches of every kind. And near
them are the maidens of Delos, priestesses of the
Archer-God, who celebrate in song Apollo and Artemis
and Leto their mother, and the glory of the famous men
and the
[160] famous women of old, charming with their hymn the
hearts of mortal men."
Delos, in fact, was the meeting-place of the Ionian
tribes, one of the great branches of the Hellenic race.
An immemorial tradition had placed there the
birth-place of Apollo and his sister Artemis, and the
temple of Apollo, who seems to have had more than his
share of the worshippers' homage, became the centre of
attraction. A Greek was accustomed to combine pleasure
with his religious duties, and the festival was made
more attractive by athletic and artistic contests.
Again, neither religion nor amusement distracted his
attention from commerce. Delos was singularly well
placed to be a trade centre; it lay in the line of the
great trade routes, whether ending in Italy to the
West, or in Egypt and Syria eastwards. Both causes
acted together to make it a rich and popular place.
Then came the change, the first of the many
vicissitudes of fortune through which the island has
passed. The great Ionian cities on the mainland of Asia
Minor fell into the hands of their neighbours on the
East, becoming tributaries first to the Lydian and
afterwards to the Perisan Kings. The festival was
dropped; we do not know the precise date of its
discontinuance, but, it must have been at some time in
the course of the sixth century B.C. Something,
however, of its old sanctity still clung to the island.
When the Persian generals, Datis and
[161] Artaphernes were on their way to Greece in 490, the
inhabitants of Delos, fearful of the fate which had
overtaken others islanders, fled from their homes. They
took refuge in Tenos, which, lying as it did outside
the direct route to Athens, would, they hoped, be
overlooked by the Persians.
Datis sent a herald to them with a conciliatory and
reassuring message. It was to this effect:
"Why have ye thus fled, ye holy men? Why think ye so
ill of me? Surely I had been sufficiently wise, even
without the king's command to spare the land which was
the birth-place of the two gods,
to spare both the land and them that dwell therein.
Come ye back therefore to your homes, and inhabit again
your island."
Anxious, it is possible, to atone for any slight, he
offered the huge, the almost incredible amount of three
hundred talents of frankincense on the altar of the
temple of Apollo.
This was in 490, the Persian army being on its way to
Attica, where it was to fight the disastrous battle of
Marathon. Fourteen years afterwards Delos
[162] became, in virtue of its central position, a place of
the greatest importance. The defeat of the Persians at
Salamis in 480, and at Platæa and Mycale 479, had
relieved Greece of immediate fear of invasion, but
there were many reasons for continuing hostilities. The
invaders had behaved with the greatest barbarity,
sparing nothing, sacred or profane, and had thus laid
up against themselves a store of wrongs which it would
take a generation to expiate. Then again, many Greek
communities were still subject to their tyranny.
Finally, the danger of invasion, though removed for a
time, might revive. As long as Greece consisted of a
number of independent states, jealous of each other,
and bound together by no common sentiment, so long a
powerful enemy would be dangerous to them. The enemy
had found traitors among them already, and he would
certainly find them again. To oppose him successfully
it would be necessary to form a confederation. For some
time after the victories of 479 the Greek forces were
under Spartan command. But the misconduct of Pausanias
and the general incapacity of the Spartans for rule put
an end to this arrangement. Athens naturally succeeded
to the place thus vacated; and Athens at once set about
forming what may be called an Anti-Persian league. Both
the sacred associations and the position of Delos,
pointed it out as the head-quarters of the alliance,
and Athens, which
[163] had not yet exchanged its generous patriotism for
selfish ambition, willingly assented. An assessment
towards the common object—operations against the
Persian foe—was made on the members of the alliance.
The total amount of the money payment was large, as
much as £106,000,
and there were also contingents of ships of war. We do
not know the details of this assessment, but we are
informed that it was made by Aristides, and that it
gave then and afterwards universal satisfaction.
It is no part of my plan to relate the history of the
Delian confederacy. The materials for such a history,
indeed, are very scanty. We know that Naxos revolted
about ten years after its formation, and Thasos very
shortly afterwards. Both islands were subdued, chiefly,
of course, by the power of Athens. The natural result
was the aggrandizement of the victorious city. Little
by little her relations to her allies were changed. One
after another, they were compelled or consented to
commute the contingent of warships for an increased
money contribution. Before thirty years had passed all
the allies, with two exceptions, had become
tributaries, content to fulfil their obligations by a
money payment, these two being Chios and Lesbos.
Meanwhile the first object of the confederation had
been receding into the distance.
[164] The Persians had almost ceased to be formidable to
Greece; any dangers which threatened the country in
that direction were only made serious by the
unprincipled competition which the leading Greek states
carried on against each other. Athens began to use the
fleet for her own purposes, for expanding her dominion
and pushing her own commerce. Nothing could be a more
significant mark of this change, than the fact that the
treasury was transferred from Delos to Athens. This
transfer took place in the year 454 B.C. Though the
island must be supposed to have lost something of its
dignity by this change, its splendour and we may say
its prosperity, were, it may be said, increased. These
were at their height during the twenty years that
intervened between 454 and the commencement of the
Peloponnesian war in 432. Athens had reached her
culminating point of wealth and power, and she
delighted to make the embassies sent to the Sacred
Island more and more magnificent. One occasion of this
kind was long remembered for the splendour which
distinguished it. The leader of the embassy was Nicias,
son of Niceratus, the chief of the aristocratic party
in Athens, and one of the wealthiest men in the
country.
Commonly the effect of the spectacle was marred by the
unmanageable crowd that had assembled to witness the
landing of the
[165] embassy. Nicias remedied this, by disembarking the
previous day on the island of Rheneia, which is
separated from Delos by a strait about half a mile in
breadth. He had brought with him, from Athens, in
separate pieces, a bridge which was to be thrown across
the channel. These were put together in the course of
the night. The next day the procession, a numerous body
consisting of some of the principal citizens of Athens,
with musicians splendidly attired, and choruses of
youths and maidens clad in white, made its way at a
slow and measured pace across the bridge, itself a
handsome structure adorned with gilding and tapestry.
With the Peloponnesian war naturally commenced a
decline in the fortunes of Delos. The resources of
Athens were taken up, and more than taken up, with
warlike expenditure, and the cost of the embassies had
to be seriously curtailed. Then her attitude towards
her dependencies was greatly changed. She became a
grudging and oppressive ruler. In 426 the Athenians
undertook a complete purification of the island. All
remains of the dead were removed, and an ordinance was
made for the future, that, as far as could be
prevented, no birth or death was to take place upon the
island. Four years later all the native inhabitants
were removed and settled on the mainland. A part of
them, however, were permitted to return after the
conclusion of the peace of Nicias, the
[166] Athenians attributing their disasters to the wrath
Apollo at the ill-treatment of his protégés.
After the fall of Athens in 404, when the dependencies
of Athens had their freedom restored to them, the
Delians became independent. Their independence however,
did not last long. Athens recovered possession of the
island when the Spartans' supremacy in Greece ceased to
exist. Nor did she lose it when Philip of Macedon
became practically the ruler of Greece. This, as has
been well remarked, she would hardly have been
permitted to do, if the island had been of any great
value. The fact is that the first three quarters of the
fourth century B.C. were a period of great depression
in the history of Delos. The inscriptions from which
our knowledge of this history is mainly derived, have
very little to tell us. The Athenian embassy, if it was
not entirely discontinued had little pomp or splendour
about it. Offerings from other states, from princes
Greek or Oriental, were no longer sent. The names of
Philip and Alexander are conspicuously absent.
Then came another change, brought about by the death of
Alexander.
The Generals, who sought to divide among themselves the
inheritance of the great Conqueror's empire, proclaimed
the independence of the Greek states, in the hope of
gaining popularity and prestige, and Delos was thus
enabled again to escape from the
[167] dominion of Athens. She did more; she became a
political power, making herself, on the strength of her
ancient name and sacred associations, the centre of an
Ægean confederacy. It could not be said that the island
became absolutely independent; that it could hardly be,
possessing as it did no resources of its own, and
commanding no naval or military strength. Nevertheless
Delos was a power; the rival monarchies which had
divided among themselves the empire of Alexander in
turns courted, and, when occasion demanded, protected
her, made use of her religious prestige, and availed
themselves of her central position for the purposes of
commerce.
The first power, however, to enter into friendly
relations with the Sacred Island was not one of the
monarchies set up by Alexander's generals, but the
Republic of Rhodes. Rhodes, gifted with a magnificent
climate—it was the island of the Sun-god and never, it
was said, missed for a whole day the sight of his
face—and a fertile soil, had been wealthy from the
earliest times. But it owed its greatness, at least in
a large measure, to the political foresight of its
people. Towards the end of the fifth century its three
cities, putting aside, with an abnegation rare in Greek
history, their passion for independence, combined to
make one powerful metropolis to which the name of the
island was given. For the next eighty years Rhodes
sided, as policy seemed to
[168] dictate, with one or other of the powers that contended
for mastery in the Ægean, with Athens, with Sparta,
with Thebes, even with the Carian princes of
Halicarnassus.
It had to submit to Alexander, and to receive a
Macedonian garrison. This it expelled after the
conqueror's death, and it resisted all efforts to
subdue it. The repulse of Demetrius, surnamed
Poliorcetes or besieger of cities, after a siege which
lasted for a whole year, was particularly famous. This
was the power then that first supported—it is possible
that it may even have suggested the confederacy
of—Delos. The inscriptions found in the island, which
are, indeed, the chief authorities for its history,
record magnificent presents sent by the Rhodian
Republic to the Temple of Apollo, and honours bestowed
by the Delians in return on eminent Rhodian citizens.
Rhodes had been on friendly terms with the Greek kings
of Egypt. We find, for instance, that among the
conditions on which Demetrius raised the siege, was
the
[169] stipulation that the Rhodians should help him in any
enterprise that he might undertake, except against
Egypt. It was Egypt that succeeded to Rhodes in the
patronage of Delos. Delos was even more essential to
the trade of Egypt, lying, as the latter country does,
far away in the south-east of the Mediterranean, than
it had been to Rhodes. The Ptolemies, accordingly, were
liberal in their gifts to the Delian Apollo, while they
protected the island and even collected its revenues.
The Delians, on the other hand, instituted festivals
which they called after their patrons' names, and
erected statues in their honour. Not only royal
personages, but officers of state and naval and
military commanders, even such minor personages as the
king's physician or the director of the Great Library
were complimented in this way.
Egypt, however, did not monopolize the favour of the
islanders. The rival powers of Syria and Macedonia made
advances to the priesthood of Apollo, and these
advances were graciously received. Delos regarded all
these powers with a benevolent neutrality, opened her
port to their fleets, and received their gifts with
absolute impartiality. Complimentary inscriptions,
statues, and festivals were at the service of the
Antiochi of Syria and the Philippi of Macedonia, and of
their ministers or favourites. Towards the end of the
third century, indeed, Egypt was superseded
[170] by Macedonia in the place of chief patron and
protector; in the beginning of the second, Rhodes
regained her old supremacy.
But now a new power appeared upon the scene. Rome,
after passing successfully through the long struggle of
the Second Punic War, began to push her conquests in
the East. Antiochus III of Syria received a crushing
defeat at Magnesia, in 190 B.C. Twenty-two years
afterwards the Macedonian kingdom came to an end at the
fatal battle of Pydna. Roman trade followed Roman
conquest, and was not slow in perceiving the natural
advantages of the place. The commercial importance of
the island rapidly recovered, till in 166 B.C. it was
declared a free port. This proceeding gave a vast
impetus to its trade, chiefly at the expense of its old
patron Rhodes, whose customs revenue sank in three
years from £35,000 to scarcely £6,000. But it was the
place, not the people, that enjoyed this prosperity.
The Roman capitalists, selfish and unscrupulous as
ever, procured, along with the decree that made the
island a free port, the expulsion of the inhabitants.
Twenty years afterwards the trade of Delos was largely
increased by the fall of Corinth. This great trading
rival removed—indeed, it was a century before Corinth
rose from her ruins—the Island enjoyed something like a
monopoly of the Mediterranean trade. The exports of the
East, spices and fruits, gems and
[171] ivory, besides works of Greek art, filled her markets.
When in 133 Asia
became a Roman province, this commerce was enormously
increased, for Asia, which Tacitus describes as still
rich after it had suffered two centuries of spoliation,
was then wealthy beyond description. No branch of
trade, it is probable, was more lucrative than the
slave market, in which, it is said, as many as ten
thousand were sometimes sold in the course of a single
day. The Roman capitalists, as time went on, shared
with other nations, doubtless for satisfactory
considerations, the vast business which found a centre
in the island. As early as 150 B.C. the merchants of
Tyre had a corporation there under the protection of
Hercules; while Jews, Syrians, and Egyptians had
factories of their own. It was a meeting place, we may
say, for the trade of the civilized world.
The end to this prosperity came in the first half of
the first century B.C. In the year 87, Arsaces, one of
the generals of Mithridates, king of Pontus, sacked the
island. The pirates, whose ravages in the Mediterranean
were hardly checked till Pompey's masterly strategy
cleared them out of it, completed the ruin thus begun.
At the beginning of the Christian era the island was
almost deserted. To-day, it affords pasture to a few
sheep, and is inhabited, for
[172] a part at least of the year, by the shepherds who tend
them.
A few years ago there seemed to be a chance that
commerce, which is ever changing its routes, might give
it back something of its old prosperity. When
steam-ships first began to traverse the Mediterranean,
and it was necessary to find a stopping-place for them,
the rival claims of Delos and Syra (the ancient Syros)
were considered. Syra was chosen, and the place, which
was then almost uninhabited, now numbers nearly fifty
thousand inhabitants.
I shall now attempt to give some account of the
appearance of the Sacred Island as it appeared to a
visitor, say in the earlier half of the second century
before our era. Approaching, let us suppose, from the
west, he enters the Sacred Harbour, and sees before him
a terrace fronting the sea. Behind the terrace is the
Temple of Apollo, and behind the Temple, again, rises
the famous hill of Cynthus, celebrated in all praises
and prayers addressed to the twin children of Latona.
The slopes of the hill are covered with buildings,
sacred and secular, whose white marble walls stand out
against the green foliage of the Sacred Wood. He lands
on the left or north side of the harbour, and passing
through a stately portico finds himself in an open
space adorned with statues. On his left hand is the
Commercial, on his right the Sacred City. Determining
first to visit the latter he passes under
[173] a stately gate, formed of Doric columns, which the city
of Athens had given to Apollo in the days of its
supremacy. A road leads up to the Temple of the chief
Delian god. It is lined on either side with statues,
some of them being among the finest products of Greek
art. The Temple itself is a small building, measuring
only a hundred and four feet by forty-four. But it is
of the finest Parian marble and exquisitely
proportioned. This also the Delians owe to the
munificence of the Athenians, who built it when they
recovered their hold of the island, early in the fourth
century. It is in the Doric style, but its columns are
not fluted. On the left or north of Apollo's shrine is
the chapel of his mother, and on the north of this
again, that of Aphrodite. In a partial semicircle
round the shrine are the Treasuries, crowded with the
offerings of the munificent piety of Greater Greece.
The enclosure and shrine of Artemis lie more to the
west. The whole of the consecrated shore is surrounded
by a finely-finished granite wall. It abounds with
statues, altars, halls, and colonnades, the "Portico of
Philip," king of Macedonia (220-179), being conspicuous
among these last for magnitude and beauty; while the
most striking, if not the most beautiful of the statues
is the Colossus presented by the island of Naxos. If
the traveller desires to find a lodging he can be
accommodated in one of the hostelries which line almost
the whole of the enclosing wall. The
[174] hospitality of the priests is supposed to be
gratuitous, but he is expected to make some
proportionate offering.
The wonders and beauties of the Sacred City having been
viewed, the visitor turns his steps to the commercial
quarter. This indeed lies on both sides of the
consecrated enclosure, but its most stately buildings
are to be found on the north side of the island,
conspicuous among them being what, to use a modern
phrase, we may call the Roman factory or "Schola
Romanorum;" if he has a friend among the resident
merchants, he will probably find that he has a
residence on the western slope of Mount Cynthus.
This is a sketch of what the labours of archæological
explorers have discovered among the ruins of Delos. All
the treasures of the island have disappeared. Nothing
of consequence in either gold or silver has been found,
and not a single specimen of the precious Delian bronze
in which the great sculptor Myron was accustomed to
work. Only fragments of the statues remain. For
centuries, indeed, the place was used as a quarry. The
Knights of St. John fortified Malta with marble from
its ruins; the church of Tenos was built from Delian
materials, Greek houses and Turkish courts were
constructed out of the inexhaustible store. But the
plan of the buildings can be traced, and in some cases
the elevation restored.
[175] But the most precious survival of all is the
magnificent collection of inscriptions. These number
more than fifteen hundred, and furnish us with a
record, such as literature proper does not attempt to
give, of the "Sacred Island" and its people.
|