|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily Life in a Castle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DAILY LIFE IN A CASTLE
[75] THE Château Gaillard was built primarily for a
fortification; but in general a castle was meant for a
dwelling-place as well as a fortress, and its keep was
the home of the master and his family. Their life was
not always so narrow and cramped as one might fancy.
Some castles, to be sure, consisted of little more than
a single strong tower and a moat; but in others the
outer court was large enough to contain not only a
garden, a poultry yard, and a watermill, but also a
lake or fishpond for a time of siege, an orchard, and
even cultivated fields. This outer court was sometimes
almost like a village, for there was often a forge, a
bakery, a carpenter's shop, a falconry, and a stable,
besides houses and a church. In the inner court there
was frequently a chapel also; but this church more than
once served a double purpose. It was sure to suffer if
the castle was stormed; and then a messenger was let
down from the postern gate to make his way to friends
and report that a sacrilegious enemy was attacking the
Church of God. If they would then win the
[76] favor of the Church authorities, they must hasten to
the rescue.
The centre of the daily life of the castle was the
large room known as the hall. This varied greatly at
different times and in different places. In the earlier
days, the hall was only a bare room with some flat
stones in the centre. On these meat was cooked, and the
smoke found its way out through a hole in the roof as
best it could. As time passed and towers were built of
several stories, fireplaces with flues were made. The
floor was tiled and strewn with rushes. The walls were
hung with banners, tapestry, and standards bright with
armorial bearings. Here and there were shields and
armor or a cluster of lances. Long oaken tables with
wooden benches stood ready for use, or else before each
meal trestles were brought in, and boards were laid
upon them, for in those days "the festive board" was a
literal board. The table of the master of the castle
stood at one end of the hall. This place was called the
dais. At the opposite end of the room was a wooden
gallery for musicians, built halfway up the wall.
A BED-CHAMBER
|
When bedtime came, coarse mattresses were laid on the
floor; for here the people of the household and their
guests were to pass the night. The bed of the noble and
his wife stood at the farther end of the hall,
separated
[77] from the rest of the room by curtains; but later, when
other stories were added, a room for them and also
other bedrooms were built, some on the upper floors and
some in the thickness of the walls. In the simpler
castles the furnishings of these bedrooms were few and
plain, hardly more than one or more beds, a bench or
two, and a wooden chest; but in the dwellings of the
wealthy there was considerable display. The posts of
the beds were sometimes gilded, inlaid with ivory, or
ornamented with precious stones; and the bed coverings
were of silk or fur
[78] with a golden fringe. There was also a wardrobe made
gorgeous with bright colors. The chests were handsomely
carved, and for jewels there were smaller chests
covered with leather. Frequently there was in one
corner a richly ornamented shrine enclosing a relic of
some saint. It is said that in Italy the beds were
often put high up on trestles to escape the rats and
mice.
There was a certain rude magnificence about the place,
but there was not what the people of to-day would call
comfort. For instance, those heavy stone walls must
have been cold, but in England, even so late as the
fifteenth century, a fire in one's bedroom was regarded
as a foolish indulgence; and the rooms were certainly
not so light as we wish our rooms to be. It was not
safe to make the windows too large, and even a window
of generous size would not let in much sunshine if cut
into a wall ten or fifteen feet in thickness. The rooms
were often made more cheerful, however, by decorations
of red and yellow and blue, or by paintings of flowers
and leaves, conventionally treated and decidedly
crude, but bright and cheery.
In those wardrobes and richly carved chests in the
bedrooms there was no lack of expensive clothes. In the
fourteenth century England tried her best to keep her
[79] people from extravagance in dress and to oblige them to
wear goods of English weaving. Parliament decreed that
no one but the king, queen, and their children should
be allowed to wear imported cloth, and that no one
should wear foreign furs or silks unless he had a
yearly rent of £100. In the fourteenth century, £100
would buy as much as several times that amount to-day,
so that a man had to be very well to do before the law
would permit him and his family to dress as they chose.
COSTUME OF TIME OF CHARLES III
|
The fashions changed as extremely, if not quite so
rapidly, as to-day. Toward the end of this century,
English ladies wore tight-fitting dresses with long,
full skirts. The sleeves were tight, extending down to
the knuckles, and with sixty or seventy buttons on each
arm. A few years later, buttons were no longer seen on
the sleeves, and the sleeves themselves came only to
the wrist. They grew larger and looser, so loose that
finally a second pair, made to fit closely, were worn
under
[80] them. Tightly fitting jackets were introduced and were
worn with full skirts of some other color. The only
rule in regard to wearing colors was apparently to have
plenty of them. A blue petticoat, displayed by lifting
a purple skirt adorned with a broad yellow band and
worn with an ermine-trimmed jacket, was evidently
regarded as being in most excellent taste; and
apparently a combination of long, loose robe of blue,
yellow girdle, red cloak, and red shoes was felt to be
above criticism. At several periods during the Middle
Ages it was in the height of the mode for a lady of
rank to wear a dress presenting the coat of arms of her
husband's family and her own; but it must have been a
wee bit startling to see a noble dame appear in a dress
white on one side with some conventional figures in
black, and yellow on the other side with a gorgeous red
lion rampant for ornament. This costume was completed
by a tight blue jacket trimmed with ermine, a close red
cap, and a crown.
But of all the remarkable fashions, those pertaining to
the headdress were the most astounding. In the
thirteenth century and again in later times, married
women wore the wimple, that is, a covering of linen or
silk arranged in folds over the chin, neck, and the
sides of the face; but this gradually disappeared in
favor of even
[81] more surprising modes. At one time the hair was put
smoothly into a net, often made of thread of gold; then
it was so puffed out at the sides that a fashionable
lady had the appearance of wearing horns. These grew
higher and higher, but at length a steeple-shaped cap
took their place. This was followed by one made of wire
and various sorts of thin material put together in
such a way that the cap stood out on either side of the
head like the wings of an enormous butterfly. Another
style of headdress was made like a giant cornucopia,
and was worn slanting up and back. From this hung a
sort of drapery that floated over the shoulders; and
from its highest point a long scarf streamed down the
lady's back to the floor. One sort of headdress was
shaped like a harp, one like a heart, one like a tower
with battlements, from the top of which a
[82] long white veil floated. One was like a large crescent
with a generous amount of drapery, and one looked
exactly as if two large napkins had been shaken out
and hung by their centres over long sticks which in
some marvelous way were made to stand firm in my lady's
hair.
COSTUME OF THE 15TH CENTURY
|
The heads of the men were free from such wild freaks of
fashion, but they, too, delighted in bright colors. A
long loose gown of brilliant red, its full sleeves
lined with ermine and half concealing another pair
which were blue and tight, the trimming of the whole of
the most dazzling yellow, was thought to be a quiet
but appropriate costume for a king. This garb was
completed by a sort of fez worn on the head, red and
with red drapery hanging around it well banded with
yellow. Small attention was paid to cleanliness. The
English thought the French exceedingly extravagant
because they changed their ruffles once a week and put
on clean shirts once a fortnight.
For men as well as for women strict laws were made,
even if they were not strictly obeyed. Toward the end
of the fourteenth century serving men in England were
forbidden to wear cloth costing more than two marks,
that is, sixteen ounces of silver, apiece. Men
practicing
[83] any handicraft might wear cloth only and no jewelry;
while if their wives ventured to wear any fur save that
of lamb, coney, cat, and fox, they were in danger of
getting into trouble. Squires whose income from land
was two hundred marks a year were allowed to wear cloth
of silver and a "reasonable" amount of silver
ornamentation. A gentleman with the same income, but
not a
[84] squire, was limited to cloth, and even a "reasonable"
amount of jewelry was forbidden him. Even a knight with
an annual income of £200 was forbidden to wear cloth of
gold and the ermine and minever, or perhaps squirrel,
that were sacred to royalty. Shoes were worn with
pointed toes so long that they had to be fastened to
the knees with slender chains of gold or silver. Laws
were passed limiting the length of those toes to two
inches; but sumptuary laws, as laws concerning dress
are called, are rarely obeyed; and while the lawmakers
continued to make them, the people moved on serenely
and broke as many of them as their purses or their
credit would permit. To the humbler folk it was a mark
of rising in the world to dress themselves a little
more richly than the law permitted; and as for the
great folk, it would have been strange enough if these
people so independent in other affairs had shown
themselves meek and yielding in the matter of the
clothes that they put on their own backs and paid for
out of their own pockets. The wearers of the crown
hardly set them an example of simplicity, for it is
said that Richard II had a coat of cloth of gold
decorated with precious stones which was worth thirty
thousand marks. His nobles had no hesitation in
following the lead of their lord, and
[85] it is claimed that one of them had two hundred and
fifty "new sutes of apparell of cloth of gold or
tissue." Such was the dress of the day, and the sombre
old stone walls of the castles must have afforded a
most excellent background for its display.
LADIES OF THE 14TH CENTURY
|
These brilliant costumes were not for everyday wear,
however, for even in a fortified castle there were
common days and a home life. The hall was the centre
of this home life, the general living room, as has been
said. Of course its size varied greatly according to
the wealth and wishes of the master of the castle. One
hall is described as being able to hold one thousand
men. Others were small; but whether their dimensions
were wide or narrow, the general character did not
alter. For seats there were chairs and benches, and
sometimes handsome cushions on the floor, and there was
always a fireplace, for many generations in the centre
of the room, wherein big round logs blazed and glowed.
Even the best of fires in an open fireplace, however,
are inclined to "burn the face and freeze the back,"
and the tapestry on the walls served a useful purpose
in adding to the comfort of the hall. In the castles of
wealthy nobles, these hangings were sometimes made of
brocade or cloth of gold and silver brought from the
East; but in the fifteenth
cen- [86] tury very handsome tapestries were woven in Europe,
especially in Flanders, in what is now called Belgium,
and at Arras in northern France. Indeed, the Arras
tapestry came into so common use that Shakespeare says
"behind the arras," when he means behind the tapestry.
Some tapestry was simple, but that which was made for
kings and princes and cathedrals was often most
elaborate. It pictured scenes from the Bible or from
the lives of saints or from hunting and hawking or from
some of the romances which were such a delight to the
people of the Middle Ages.
Early in the morning the watchman of the castle sounded
his horn from the battlements of the keep to say that
the sun had risen and all was well. The day was short,
for people in general did not sit up very long after
the five o'clock supper. The dinner hour was from nine
to eleven in the forenoon. In the hall were held the
mighty feasts in which the noble appetites of the day
so rejoiced. What would a modern caterer say to a bill
of fare that began boldly with venison, a quarter of
bear, and the shoulder of a wild boar, and worked its
way valiantly onward through a course of roasted
peacocks and swans, a second of poultry, and a third of
waterfowl and small game to venison and pheasant
pasties
[88] and pigeon pie? By the time that this was reached, the
feast was fairly under way, and the guests were well
prepared for such trifles as shad, salmon, mullet, and
eel-pie, the last a special favorite. After this came
pastry of all sorts and sweetmeats, then cloves,
ginger, and other spices. These made people ravenously
thirsty, and they were quite ready for the big cups of
wine mixed with honey or spice that now appeared. The
young pages of the castle attended upon the guests, but
the heavier waiting was done by stalwart serving men.
A DINNER IN THE HALL
|
A feast like this was only a simple repast compared
with that served in 1403 at the marriage of Henry IV.
There were only six courses, but a course included an
amazing collection of eatables. The second course, for
instance, comprised venison served with frumenty, a
dish made of milk, sugar, and wheat; jelly; sucking
pigs; rabbits; bitterns; stuffed hens; partridges;
leach, that is, a mixture of cream, sugar, almonds, and
isinglass; and boiled meat of some sort. The course
ended, as did every course, with what was called a
"sotelte," or subtlety. This was somewhat like what is
known to-day as a "float," only on a very small scale.
One that was served at this feast was an image of a
pelican sitting on her nest with her young ones, and
beside it Saint
Cath- [89] erine holding a book in her hand and disputing with the
doctors. Another much more elaborate was made for the
coronation of Henry VI. In this, the Child Jesus sits
on his mother's knees. Saint George and Saint Denis
kneel one on either side. King Henry bears in his hand
a petition for the favor of the "Blessyd Lady, Cristes
moder dere." These subtleties were made of sugar or
pastry and added much to the interest of the feast. In
general, however, the glory of a banquet consisted not
in nicety of cooking and elegance of serving, but
rather in providing unlimited quantities and countless
varieties of food. The peacock and the swan were looked
upon as the most luxurious dishes of the age. The
peacock was carefully skinned, then roasted; but before
he was brought to the table, his skin was fastened
around him with skewers. An old recipe for serving the
swan is as follows:—
Make a stiff bed of paste about the thickness of your
thumb and color it green. Comb it out, and it will look
like a meadow of green grass. Take your swan and gild
him over with gold then have a kind of loose, flying
cloak of a vermilion color within and painted with arms
without; then set the swan upon this bed, cover some
part of him with the cloak, stick about him small
banners upon little sticks, the banners painted
[90] with the arms most agreeable to the people seated at
the table.
As time passed, less meat and more vegetables were
used. The bread was of various sorts. In England the
best and finest was marked with the figure of Christ
and was called "Our Lord's bread." There were at least
two grades of bread below this, not counting the "wastel
bread," a very coarse brown bread. Wine was much in
evidence, but the everyday drinks were different
varieties of ale or mead.
The dishes used at table varied as greatly as they do
in the homes of to-day. The cups or goblets were
handsome when the expense could be afforded. They were
made of gold or silver and beautifully ornamented with
precious stones. Often a feast was lighted by men
ranged along the walls of the room, bearing flaming
torches; and the jewels must have gleamed and flashed
in the ever-changing glare. People ate from trenchers,
or rude plates. At first, thick slices of stale bread
were used; then trenchers were made of wood and were
kept measurably clean by being scoured with ashes.
People of the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth
centuries were well content to eat two at a trencher.
The phrase, "a
[91] valiant trencher man," was the literal description
of a man with a good appetite—and appetites
were good in those days. Even in the
sixteenth century, Anne Boleyn, wife of Henry VIII,
regretted that she could eat for breakfast only half a
pound of bacon and drink
[92] only half a tankard of ale. She ascribed her loss of
appetite to the late hours that she was keeping, "being
scarcely in bed before ten," she lamented.
A KNIGHT'S FEAST
|
The serving dishes were made of wood, pewter, silver,
or gold, according to the wealth of the master of the
castle. Knives and spoons and fingers were used as
weapons of table warfare. Forks were in use in Italy,
but it was well into the seventeenth century or even
later before they became at all common in the other
countries of Europe. For a long while they were looked
upon in monasteries as a foolish and sinful luxury. An
Englishman who traveled in Italy in the early part of
the seventeenth century was pleased with the custom,
"seeing that all men's fingers are not alike clean," as
he said pathetically, and he brought home one of these
new implements for his own use; whereupon one, a merry
friend of his, persisted in calling him the
"furcifer," or fork-bearer. For folk who were not
"fork-bearers," water and towels were passed around
several times during a feast. The table linen was clean
and plentiful; but the floor was covered with rushes,
with bones and other refuse, and perhaps had not been
swept for twenty years. A feast in a nobleman's castle
was a grotesque medley of splendor and filth.
[93] No entertainment was looked upon as complete without
music. This was provided by minstrels. They used a sort
of violin, and also the harp, lute, guitar, bagpipe,
flute, and double-flute, horn, and trumpet, and sometimes
the drum, tambourine, cymbals, and handbells.
A noble usually had one or more minstrels in his service
who wore at their girdles his badge, a little scutcheon
engraved with his coat of arms. While the great folk
feasted, the minstrels played and sang, sometimes in
their own gallery, sometimes, on less formal occasion
from seats on the floor, or even on the edge of the
table. They sang merry little ballads and favorite bits
from the longer poems glorifying the noble deeds of
heroes, and they also gave long recitations from the
romances that the people of those times found so
thrillingly entertaining.
THE MUSICIANS
|
[94] Besides the minstrels who were members of noble
households, there were also the wandering singers, some
of good family, who became minstrels for a time in
order to gratify a taste for roving. Many of these had
real talent, and they roamed through the lands, sure of
a friendly greeting, a cup of wine, and a generous meal
wherever they might go. If the minstrel's songs were
pleasing to the lord of the castle, the singer went
away rejoicing in a goodly sum of money. If neither the
lord nor his guests were liberally inclined, many
minstrels were not above stopping in the midst of their
song or story and saying, "If you wish to hear any more
of this poem, you must make haste to open your purses."
Minstrels were free to go where they would, for all
classes of people welcomed them. It is told of Alfred
the
[95] Great that he disguised himself as a wandering singer
and went fearlessly into the camp of his enemies.
Whether this is doubtful or not in the case of Alfred,
it was certainly true in many other cases; for at the
sound of a harp or violin the good folk of the Middle
Ages seemed to lay aside all caution and forget all
danger.
THE JUGGLERS
|
Besides music, other entertainment was provided for the
guests at these banquets by jugglers, or
sleight-of-hand performers, who went through acrobatic
feats and the old tricks of balancing weights on long
poles, tossing up balls and keeping several up in the
air at the same time, exhibiting trained bears, and
carrying on any sort of jesting that seemed to amuse
their audience. A similar entertainment was provided
by the "fool" of the castle, for kings and wealthy men
were in the habit of keeping a jester who was known by
that name. He often wore a cap and bells or a costume
half one color and half another, or even shaved half
his hair and half his beard to suit the rather crude
ideas of what was considered comical. His joking was
frequently coarse
[96] and rough, but it was to the point, for only a keen,
shrewd man could play well the part of fool. In
Shakespeare's dramas it happens more than once that
the fool manifests more closeness of observation and
more common sense than any one else in the play.
ACROBATS
|
Among these strolling companies of singers and jugglers
there were also women dancers, who met with great
favor. The popular notion of a dexterous dancer was one
who could support herself on her hands while her feet
were high up in the air. If she could rest her hands on
two swords and still maintain her equilibrium, that was
indeed skill,
[97] and the spectators shouted their applause and threw
their coins with delight.
A JESTER
|
But the hall was far more than a mere place of
feasting. Here sat the lady of the castle and her
maidens, daughters of other noble families who had come
to her to learn housewifery just as their brothers had
come to her husband to learn to become knights. These
young girls were taught to manage a household, to sew
and embroider, to card wool and spin and weave. They
learned
[98] to say the prayers of the Church, to sing, and to play
simple accompaniments on the harp or viol. A little of
astronomy too, they learned, enough at least to name a
few of the constellations; possibly a little of reading
and writing, and more than a little of falconry. They
must ride well, of course, for to make a poor
appearance in the hunting field or in practicing the
"mystery of rivers" would be indeed a disgrace. One
thing they were taught with especial thoroughness, and
that was enough of surgery and medicine and nursing to
care for a wounded knight. Somewhat of warfare, too,
they must know; for when the lord of the castle was
away, it was his wife who must command the men at arms
and either save or lose her home. The girls of the
castle played checkers, chess, backgammon, and
battledoor and shuttlecock, they had their pet birds,
magpies, larks, and sometimes parrots, or popinjays, as
they were called. Falcons were pets as well as hunters,
and often made their entrance into society
[99] perched upon the wrists of their mistresses. The
maidens of the Middle Ages liked to go on picnics, to
dance, and to wear their best clothes; they enjoyed
putting on jeweled belts and pretty ornaments and soft
furs and dainty silks just as much as any girls of
to-day, and they were just as delighted when there was
to be a tournament as girls are to-day at the prospect
of any entertainment.
A BEDROOM PARTY
|
LADY AT LOOM
|
All sorts of folk came into the hall. In many places
the poor of the neighborhood came every morning to ask
for bread. If any fighting was near at hand—and the
chief business of the time was fighting and hunting—a
wounded man often made his way to the castle to beg for
help and care. Sometimes, as has been said, a knight
errant called to the porter at the gate and bade him
bear a friendly challenge to the other knights within
the walls. Then followed a delightful confusion. The
lists were staked out in some meadow near the castle or
perhaps in the outer court. The crowd of followers and
[100] dependents of the lord flocked about the ropes, and the
ladies of the castle waved bright-colored scarfs from
windows and battlements. Vassals, or those who held
land of the master of the castle on condition of
service, came to "pay homage," that is, to kneel before
him, their hands clasped in his, and promise to be
faithful to him. Traveling merchants came to open their
packs and reveal the dazzling fabrics of the East.
Pilgrims who had wandered through many lands in order
to visit some holy place were always going to and fro
and always welcome.
FALCONRY
|
When ten or eleven o'clock had come, the horn was
blown, the long tables were spread, and all gathered
around them, whether rich or poor, noble or simple.
Those to
[101] whom special honor was to be shown were seated "above
the salt," that is, near the lord's end of the table
and separated from the common folk by an elaborate
salt-cellar. After the meal, there were games—chess,
backgammon, cards, and checkers—and also music and
dancing. Every visitor had some story to tell; the dogs
lay about the hearth, and now and then one pricked up
his ears and wagged his tail sleepily when he heard his
master praise some exploit of his in the hunt. The
flames blazed up merrily, and the gloomy hall became
bright and cheerful. It was the very heart of home, and
when a wounded knight lay dying in some foreign land,
it was his own hall, which he should never see again,
of which he thought with eager longing.
LADIES PLAYING GAMES
|
DANCING
|
|